Types of Ethics

There are many styles of the analysis that could be involved in ethical subject values. They’re too typically confused along, and to avoid this confusion, a preliminary task is to differentiate these clearly. We will consider three types here

1. Descriptive ethics

2. Normative ethics

3. Meta-ethics

Descriptive ethics

First, one would possibly want to understand what ethical values are held by the members (or groups) of the Community of that one is a component (or by some individual or cluster of individuals). Note additionally that one may notice that this society principally holds some worth that another society tends to reject. It also happen that most people of the society endorse some value whereas some other members of the society tend to reject it. Moreover, some people may reject the values that are held in their own society and adapt the values of another society. Answers to such queries would be descriptive propositions.

Characteristic of this type of descriptive representations concerning ethical values is that there's no inherent drawback in noting that are variations among individuals and across (and within) the communities they form. If one is asked to describe the values he/she simply does it, saying that number of people do or don’t  hold this or that characteristics is neutral on whether or not you ought to consider them or not.

I say ‘neutral’ as a result of searching for what moral views are held by varied individuals, as well as societies or sub-societies, is similar to searching for different facts concerning them – like their income, style in garments, their status and so forth. They're most likely to be seen as lying considering the domain of social sciences and probably could be examined through survey instruments or any other method. My point here is that descriptive ethics, which is only concerned with what is the case, is silent on what should be the case. Describing what some person’s or group’s ethical values are isn't an equivalent factor as saying what ethical values they must live their lives by.  So, our first kind of research (about the values held by different ethical agents) is a descriptive style of social science research.

Normative Ethics

Normative ethics addresses the question of ethical values that we should be living by. A question that was left unanswered by descriptive ethics.

Professional ethics are best understood as situated in the field of applied ethics. As the name suggests, is what is done in applied ethics apply certain ethical values ​​of the matter in hand. But what are the ethical values ​​you should use? Normative ethics is the field of moral philosophy that attempts to answer this question.

Normative Ethics is that part of the ethic/moral philosophy that helps in determining what is morally right and what is wrong. It distinguishes the honesty and dishonesty. It develops moral rules that have a direct impact on human actions, living, institutions, and quality of living.

The determination of moral standards that are justified and arrived is the main question of normative ethics. The answers to this question fall into two broad categories—deontological and teleological. The basic distinction between them is that deontological theories do not appeal to value considerations in establishing ethical standards, while teleological theories do.

Meta Ethics

Meta is the branch of ethics that deals with the most basic assumptions and foundations moral thoughts. What do understand by right and wrong? What is the origin of moral facts? meta ethics addresses such questions.